user warning: Table 'solar.actions_assignments' doesn't exist
query: SELECT aa.aid, a.type FROM actions_assignments aa LEFT JOIN actions a ON aa.aid = a.aid WHERE aa.hook = 'nodeapi' AND aa.op = 'view' ORDER BY weight in /var/www/atom/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 174.
Published by viorel on September 16th, 2009
in Coins
IN RECENT days the price of gold has risen above $US1000 an ounce, and
some commentators are predicting further rises to $US1200 and above.
One of the factors said to be driving these price rises is the view that
gold is an inflation hedge. The US
and some other governments are issuing very large amounts of debt, and the fear
is that these debts will eventually be monetised, with rising inflation the
result.
Gold's status as an inflation hedge dates from the time when gold coins
formed the basis of many countries' monetary systems. King Croesus of Lydia was the
first to mint gold coins more than 2500 years ago. Subsequently many a
country's ruler used the trick of debasing the value of gold coins by adding
other metals to their content. If the purity of gold in coins was diluted in
this way then inflation would occur - more coins would be required to buy
goods. But pure gold would retain its value, and hence pure gold was an
inflation hedge.
Under the more recent classical gold standard period, from the late 19th
century until the Great Depression, gold coins did not circulate but notes on
issue were backed by gold held in the banking system.
In Australia and Britain each
additional pound note in circulation had to be backed by 0.236 ounces of gold,
and so the number of notes on issue, and hence inflation, rose and fell with
international discoveries of gold. Under this system inflation occurred because
gold was more plentiful and so the real value of gold fell when inflation rose.
Rather than being a hedge, gold did poorly in real terms when inflation
occurred.
After World War II the monetary system continued to be based on a
modified gold standard. Under the ''Bretton Woods'' system, the US was supposed
to maintain a gold price of $US35 an ounce, and the US Federal Reserve limited
note issue consistent with this price. This system broke down during the
Vietnam War, as excessive note issue by the US to finance the war made it
obvious that the price of $US35 an ounce was not sustainable.
Gold was a very good inflation hedge during the 1970s. The US dollar
price rose from $35 an ounce in 1971 to $850 an ounce in January 1980. In the US the price of
goods and services doubled during this period, so investing in gold in the
early 1970s was a spectacularly good investment. But the performance of gold
since 1980 has shown clearly that gold is a pretty poor long-run hedge against
inflation. Since 1980 goods prices have almost tripled in the US, and yet
gold prices have only increased 20 per cent, even with the recent run-up in
gold prices.
The problem for gold is that now that it does not form the basis of the
global monetary system, the uses to which it can be put are quite limited when
compared with many other commodities.
Between 2003 and 2007 almost 70 per cent of gold demand was related to
jewellery production, while only 13 per cent of demand was for industrial
purposes. It might be expected that demand for jewellery will grow as emerging
economies become richer - in India,
in particular, demand for gold jewellery is very strong. But one should expect
that other commodities that are more useful in industry should see their prices
grow more quickly, as has been the case in recent years.
As with many other commodities, the price of gold tends to be quite
volatile, and it would be foolish to rule out further rises in gold prices. But
the view that gold is a good inflation hedge is not supported by the facts.